- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:23:03 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> I have no problem with that position. I just don't think it's clear from > the XML spec (for system identifiers), the XML namespace spec (for > namespace URIs), or the current RDF spec (for URI-valued attributes, etc.). Agreed. The erratum http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata#E4 is the only clear statement I've seen in the specs you've menetioned that I am aware of. I think charmod is fairly clear. Given the lack of clarity of the current RDF spec on this issue I think we can clarify it in accordance with charmod and allow international RI, which the RDF/XML processor has to UTF-8-RFC 2396 escape. I agree wholeheartedly with your desire for a clear statement of that. The main problem I see is with name-spaces. Given XML namespace's silence on the issue, maybe it means that these are already US-Ascii, which would be ugly since we would then be mixing two different forms for the same URI. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 21 September 2001 06:52:43 UTC