- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:51:43 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Pat Hayes said: > Dave said: > >4. RDFS Interpretations > > > >6th paragraph: > > "The subsets referred to in subPropertyOf are sets of pairs." > >and subsets in subClassOf? > > Er .... subsets? The point of the remark was just to remind > nonmathematical readers that a relational extension is a set of > pairs, so a subrelation is a subset. If it's confusing, maybe it > would be best omitted. My point was, is it only the subsets in subPropertyOf that are sets of pairs? Answer: yes? The subsets refered to in the subClassOf defn. and elsewhere are not. <snip/> > > A reference section in W3 style > > Oh, whoops, I forgot that. (Though isn't a bit passé to have a > references section in hypertext? Seems a bit like putting a > whip-caddy on a horseless carriage. Oh well, go with the flow. ) > > >and [CITE] for RDF M&S, RDFS, > > Test-Cases, N-Triples section in test-cases, anything else. Maybe > > normative, non-normative ones if they help. > > I don't follow this last point, I'm afraid. The two sets of references could be (this is just a suggestion) 1) Normative - documents you cite upon which this document depends for definitions, refers to directly in the text such as RDFM&S, RDFS and Test-cases etc. This section is stuff that must be read and understood in order to read the document. 2) Informative (or non-normative) - other documents. Here you could pointers to related work, theoretical basis, primers etc. This is all optional, and up to you if you have stuff that goes here. Dave
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2001 17:51:45 UTC