- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:42:14 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 03:19 PM 9/24/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >[2] >Future versions of RDF may migrate to a more general mechanism for >literal representation in which the current representation would be >embedded. One candidate is that an RDF literal would be a pair >of a unicode string and a URI reference. The current literals would >be embedded within this new representation using a well-known URI >as a base for all language tag URIs. [...] >[8] >RDF makes a distinction between equality and equivalence for >Literals. RDF Literals are equal in accordance with [2]. [...] I'm having difficulty understanding the last sentence above, in its reference to [2]. Is this a typo? .. BTW, for interest, I've submitted for publication (a revised version of) the language tag URN Internet draft I circulated last week. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 11:22:12 UTC