- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:28:18 +0100
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Frank Manola wrote: > I got hold of Sergey (who is trying to get out from under the hundreds > of messages that piled up while he was away) by phone on the subclass > cycle issue. He said he'd be on the teleconference on Friday (so > consider this just an interim FYI), but basically he said after thinking > about the issue following the F2F, he didn't see that allowing cycles in > subClassOf would make a big difference one way or the other. He felt > that not having the restriction against cycles was probably a more > general way of handling them (since you could introduce > application-specific restrictions if you wanted to), and that he > wouldn't have a problem with removing the restriction against cycles if > we wanted to conform with DAML on this. Thats great Frank. Looks like I should schedule time at this weeks telecon. How would you like to cast that, as a proposal? If so do you want to draft some words or leave it to me? Brian
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2001 11:33:03 UTC