- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:06:15 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Here's a proposal (or motion) wording: "to resolve issue rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf by allowing cycles of subClassOf properties". [If someone wants to further wordsmith that they are welcome to.] Given that I need to leave early, it would help if we could get to this during the first half of the hour (hopefully Sergey will be online as well). --Frank Brian McBride wrote: > > Frank Manola wrote: > > > I got hold of Sergey (who is trying to get out from under the hundreds > > of messages that piled up while he was away) by phone on the subclass > > cycle issue. He said he'd be on the teleconference on Friday (so > > consider this just an interim FYI), but basically he said after thinking > > about the issue following the F2F, he didn't see that allowing cycles in > > subClassOf would make a big difference one way or the other. He felt > > that not having the restriction against cycles was probably a more > > general way of handling them (since you could introduce > > application-specific restrictions if you wanted to), and that he > > wouldn't have a problem with removing the restriction against cycles if > > we wanted to conform with DAML on this. > > Thats great Frank. Looks like I should schedule time at this weeks telecon. > How would you like to cast that, as a proposal? If so do you want to > draft some words or leave it to me? > > Brian -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2001 12:11:14 UTC