- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:57:08 -0500
- To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: RDFCore WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, September 28, 2001, at 12:31 PM, Sergey Melnik wrote:
> Tracked as: #rdfms-literals-as-resources
> Dependent issue: #rdfms-literalsubjects, would be resolved
> immediately
> if literals are resources
Oh? I don't agree with that. We can say that literals are
resources (indeed, I think it's pretty clear we have to) but we
don't have to give them URIs, or a place in the RDF abstract
syntax.
--
"Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 15:57:11 UTC