- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:14:05 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
As far as my original comments are concerned, I agree I should have said URI-reference. Or, more precisely, what Dan said: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragment-identifier-s. #g -- At 01:08 PM 9/13/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >On Thursday, September 13, 2001, at 12:39 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > >>I can confirm that all the XML Schema simple/scalar datatype >>values can be represented as (unicode-string, uri) pairs >>using URIs from the XML Schema datatypes spec. > >As this has relevance to other issues, and so that the Working Group is >not misled, I believe you mean URI-references, not URIs. Is that correct? > >-- >[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ] ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 15:44:17 UTC