W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Working on glossary

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:50:48 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:10 AM 8/16/01 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > Web Resource
> >      Anything that is identified by a URI
>Nope; that rules out real numbers... yada yada...
>Since you don't claim to be done yet, I think I'll stop
>here and save my review effort for a future draft.

I don't like it either, but...

There seems to be this disconnect between resources on the web, identified 
by URIs (NOT URI-references), and RDF resources that can be identified by a 
URI+fragment identifier.

I can see how real numbers fit into the latter case, but not the 
former.  Can you elucidate?

(See also issue: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-fragments)


Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 14:49:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:04 UTC