- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:39:35 +0100
- To: aswartz@upclink.com
- Cc: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>> while at next telecon agenda items, >>> what about the N-triples/MT related questions >>> 1. predicate ::= uriref versus predicate ::= uriref | namedNode? >> >> Does RDF allow, let's call it, non-URI-ref for predicates? >> I don't think so, at present. In the graph model in the original >> M&S, predicates are arrows with URIs, they are never empty circles. > > Well maybe it's an arrow without a URI. yes, Aaron! > I think that princeNodes should be allowed in the predicate > slot... they're rather useful. yep e.g. <uri#Mary> _:pn <uri#Dan>. _:pn <uri#subPropertyOf> <uri#husband>. instead of saying <uri#Mary> <uri#firstHusband> <uri#Dan>. > While I'm giving unsolicited advice, I think that a DLG is > probably not the best way to represent the RDF model... it's > sort of difficult to picture arrows pointing at other arrows. and also the other way around, see http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3#Subexpress -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2001 19:40:09 UTC