- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:12:21 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > I've been updating ARP trying to get it to pass the test cases in the > zip file and have hit a number of problems. > > Earlier in: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0062.html > > and the related thread I queried > > rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.rdf > rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf > > > 1: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.rdf > > I suggested that the triple > > <http://example.org/resource/> <http://example.org/property> "bar" . > > was missing from rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.nt > > I got no response on that one. Um, I replied and agreed with you in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0063.html I propose we fix this by adding the triple. > 2: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf > > There was some discussion that didn't terminate on this one. > > Dave in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0063.html > wrote: > > test 8 contains an rdf:aboutEachPrefix and is thus now not in the > > RDF/XML language. The file should be renamed as an error case or > > removed entirely (it does not test anything else that is not covered > > by other cases). > > which I am supportive of. Lets fix this too by removing test0008.rdf > A further problem is that a couple of files still have xml:base in them > as highlighted in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0242.html I also support the removal of the xml:base attributes from http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test011.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test012.rdf Do we need this confirmed by the WG or can we just get these fixed as errors? Dave
Received on Friday, 21 September 2001 08:15:35 UTC