- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:02:16 +0100
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Art Barstow wrote: [...] > Since the tests are not under a publicly-readable CVS archive, > seems like the best we can do is to say that the only tests that > were approved in the Sep 12 WD are in: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/RDF-Test-Cases-2001-09-12.zip Oops, have I been misunderstanding? I've been pointing to test cases from the issues list document. Are you saying that test cases under http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ Are not publicly readable? I can read them, so they are presumably at least member readable. > > and that any test or directory not in [1] or is different than > the same file in [1] has NOT been approved. So to tell whether a test is approved or not, I have to download the zip file? That doesn't seem very satisfactory. How about we include a status in the test case files? > > >>Art, would you like to take on the role of getting formal approval >>for test cases? >> > > Seems like this should be a chair's responsiblity (perhaps as part > of tele-conf decision). OK, as you prefer. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2001 07:06:13 UTC