- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 05:53:14 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Graham Klyne wrote: > At 10:01 PM 9/28/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > >The following are true in any rdf interpretation of the rdf vocabulary > >(three typings and two domainings:) > > > >rdf:domain rdf:type rdf:Property . > > > >rdf:range rdf:type rdf:Property . > > Does this mean you are proposing to move domain and range from rdfs: to > rdf: namespace? > > (This might break a lot of deployed code. Also, they do seem rather like > rdfs: rather than rdf: vocabulary to me.) I'd assumed this was a mistake or typo, and mailed Pat offlist. domain and range currently live in the RDFS namespace. Dan (who is finding the idea of a single namespace for all these properties and classes more and more appealing...)
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2001 05:53:17 UTC