- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:59:18 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 11:50 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> There seems to be this disconnect between resources on the web,
> identified by URIs (NOT URI-references), and RDF resources that
> can be identified by a URI+fragment identifier.
First Resources can be identified by URIs, but need not be. Just
because they don't have URIs doesn't mean that they aren't
Resources. (That's my understanding, at least.)
> I can see how real numbers fit into the latter case, but not
> the former. Can you elucidate?
I don't understand that comment at all. How does adding a
fragment identifier make the URI-ref more or less able to
identify a real number?
--
"Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 14:59:19 UTC