- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:00:07 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[i'm trying to do something]
As promised in the last telecon of 2001-09-14
[[
[14:20:20] spetschu-scribe
em: does DanBri need help from the group? What can we do to help?
[14:20:28] spetschu-scribe
DanBri: test folks can help out
[14:21:02] spetschu-scribe
JosD: I could help look at the NTriples cases
]] -- http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2001-09-14.html
I started with that at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range
but W3C team should give appropriate access rights.
In the mean time it can be found at
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.rdf
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.nt
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.rdf
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.nt
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.rdf
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.nt
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.rdf
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.nt
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/axioms.n3
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/rdf/rdfs-domain-and-range/readme.txt
[[
Issue rdfs-domain-and-range:
---------------------------
Should a property be allowed more than one rdfs:range property?
What should the semantics of multiple domain and range properties be?
-> Multiple domain and range constraints are permissable
and will have conjunctive semantics.
test001
describes a property with rdfs:domain the intersection of 2 domains
test002
describes a property with rdfs:range the intersection of 2 ranges
test003
sample statement
test004
entailed description using test001, test002, test003 and axioms
axioms
a couple of N3 rules to infer rdf:type information
]]
I hope the rdf-to-nt is quite straightforward.
The entailment stuff is there to support the issue resolution.
We've been testing that with CWM and Euler.
For Euler we have
java Euler test001.nt test002.nt test003.nt axioms.n3 test004.nt
which is like
test001 test002 test003 axioms.n3 |=> test004
and it gives the appropriate evidence for the entailment.
For CWM we have
python /n3/cwm.py test001.nt test002.nt test003.nt axioms.n3 --think
and we see that that includes the statements in test004
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2001 11:00:24 UTC