Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range

Brian, Art,

> I guess this sort of test case does not fit the "here's the RDF/XML, this
> is what it means in n-triples" pattern very well, which seems to suggest
> we need a new pattern for defining schema test cases.
> Did you guys have something in mind?

You've seen that very good Brian!
There is indeed little value in the individual
cases but I still believe very hard in the
  "this is what it means in n-triples"
when one applies the "entailment pattern"
*across* the cases, and I mean also cases
at other places.
I think it is the beauty of something like
  uri1 uri2 uri3 |= uri4
that it can explain further meaning.
I also think that it is perfectly
automatable (at least we do it right now)
but we indeed need some conventions for that.

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 11:22:44 UTC