- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:20:31 +0100
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: barstow@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian, Art, > I guess this sort of test case does not fit the "here's the RDF/XML, this > is what it means in n-triples" pattern very well, which seems to suggest > we need a new pattern for defining schema test cases. > Did you guys have something in mind? You've seen that very good Brian! There is indeed little value in the individual cases but I still believe very hard in the "this is what it means in n-triples" when one applies the "entailment pattern" *across* the cases, and I mean also cases at other places. I think it is the beauty of something like uri1 uri2 uri3 |= uri4 that it can explain further meaning. I also think that it is perfectly automatable (at least we do it right now) but we indeed need some conventions for that. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 11:22:44 UTC