- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 01:36:42 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, August 29, 2001, at 09:27 AM, Dave Beckett wrote:
>> while at next telecon agenda items,
>> what about the N-triples/MT related questions
>> 1. predicate ::= uriref versus predicate ::= uriref | namedNode?
>
> Does RDF allow, let's call it, non-URI-ref for predicates?
> I don't think so, at present. In the graph model in the original
> M&S, predicates are arrows with URIs, they are never empty circles.
Well maybe it's an arrow without a URI.
I think that princeNodes should be allowed in the predicate
slot... they're rather useful.
While I'm giving unsolicited advice, I think that a DLG is
probably not the best way to represent the RDF model... it's
sort of difficult to picture arrows pointing at other arrows.
--
"Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2001 02:36:45 UTC