- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 01:36:42 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, August 29, 2001, at 09:27 AM, Dave Beckett wrote: >> while at next telecon agenda items, >> what about the N-triples/MT related questions >> 1. predicate ::= uriref versus predicate ::= uriref | namedNode? > > Does RDF allow, let's call it, non-URI-ref for predicates? > I don't think so, at present. In the graph model in the original > M&S, predicates are arrows with URIs, they are never empty circles. Well maybe it's an arrow without a URI. I think that princeNodes should be allowed in the predicate slot... they're rather useful. While I'm giving unsolicited advice, I think that a DLG is probably not the best way to represent the RDF model... it's sort of difficult to picture arrows pointing at other arrows. -- "Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2001 02:36:45 UTC