- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:04:49 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > rdfs-domain-and-range: Should a property be allowed more than > one rdfs:range property? What should the semantics of multiple > domain and range properties be? (Dan Brickley) > > This is all over but the crying. I suggest the chairs > move this to the "closed" section, with pointers to > whatever supporting materials are relevant (i.e. decision > record, test cases...) > > Oops... do we have test cases for this one? Danbri? Although I'm not Danbri, I did make some testcases at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/ but the feedback somewhere went into the "RDFS entailment test" direction (which is nice BTW). If people can live with test001 and test002 as at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.nt http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.nt we could proceed now (and extend as we go). -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 16:04:58 UTC