W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21

From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:06:47 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 01:44 PM 9/20/2001 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>8: Model Theory WD
>>Propose: Authorize publication of the Model theory WD at:
>>This version is a snapshot taken at some time 10:16 uk time  on Sept 18th
>>and copied to the archive.  At the time of preparing the minutes the
>>'current version'
>>   http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20MT-currentdraft.html
>>was not available.
>I'd propose instead the more recently corrected (in response to feedback 
>from WG) version now found at

Pat (et.al.),

I was wondering if it might make sense to include a sentence or three in 
the abstract to help explain Model Theory and the benefits of expressing 
RDF in terms of this formalization?

Something along the lines of

Model Theory is the part of mathematics which shows how to apply logic to 
the study of structures in pure mathematics.
]] - http://www.math.toronto.edu/~weiss/

and then append the following section (currently located in the Status of 
this Document)

This document was written with the intention of providing a precise 
semantic theory for RDF and RDFS, and to sharpen the notions of consequence 
and inference in RDF. It reflects the current understanding of the RDF Core 
working group at the time of writing. In some particulars this differs from 
the account given in Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax 
Specification, and these exceptions are noted.
]] -- http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20MT-currentdraft.html

to the abstract.

Does this make sense?

eric miller                              http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead               mailto:em@w3.org
w3c world wide web consortium            tel:1.614.763.1100
200 technology square, ne43-350          fax:1.208.330.5213
cambridge, ma 02139 usa                  
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2001 15:03:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:04 UTC