- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:55:20 +0100
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dave wrote: > The WD-to-be does not add or remove anything from the infoset - it > currently lists various patterns of infosets that match RDF/XML. The > next stage is to say what bits of graph they create. At that point > it might be an infoset=>infoset transformation if we choose to > continue down this route. My point is expressed by an example like <rdf:RDF xml:lang="fr" xmlns:rdf="..." /> which does not match the production 4.2/6.1, while being a legal empty RDF graph. > > We furthermore have issues with xml:lang (and literals) that have not > yet been decided. Fine, as a WD it's OK I think, and certainly I don't want to force resolution of issues that we have not yet properly considered. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 11:56:29 UTC