- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:28:40 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > > Hi Pat, > > > > > I will put off further work on the MT document until this issue is decided. > > That get's the blood flowing first thing in the morning. > > We can make this decision independently from deciding whether prince arcs are > allowed. We could; meanwhile, it's pretty clear to me that arcs with anonymous labels (?!) aren't expressible in RDF 1.0's XML syntax. I make use of them routinely in advanced-development-dialects, but I can't argue that a formalism of RDF 1.0 should include them. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org?subject=pls%20call%20+1-...
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 09:29:45 UTC