W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: question: URIs with & character

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:31:38 +0100
Message-ID: <3BA5ED2A.1040108@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> OK
> I was unaware of that process - I'll try and create that today.

Hud oan a wee minute there.

Can we just make sure we have the process clear.

So far, we have been operating a policy that all test cases must
be approved by the WG and Art's WD correctly distinguishes between
test cases that have been approved and those that have not.

The WD currently defines approval at the level of the directory.
We should not go adding test cases into a directory of approved
tests unless they have been approved.

We need some mechanism to ensure that we distinguish between approved
and unapproved test cases.

Art, would you like to suggest something here, or would you like me to?

In the meantime, lets get this test case approved.  Which I suppose
raises another question.  Art, would you like to take on the role of
getting formal approval for test cases?


> Jeremy
> Art Barstow wrote:
>>On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:07:10PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>>>What is the status on this one folks?  Looks like a good suggestion to me.
>>>Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>>>I am happy with the test case
>>>>  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/amp-in-url/test001.rdf
>>>>but suggest it could be complemented with the attached error case, which is
>>>>bad XML.
>>FYI - based on this note, I submitted a request to the sysadmin
>>team to give Jeremy access to the test repository and Jeremy
>>should now have the required account and permissions.
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 08:35:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:04 UTC