W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: RDF Model Theory drafts

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:03:09 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101007b7d656a646ea@[]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Pat, you have been updating the draft MT document and I have a hard
>time following what you have changed.

Sorry. I started off using 'added' and 'deleted' styles but it got 
unreadable, and it is a chore to put those tags round every little 
jot and tiddle. Apart from the substantive changes that have arisen 
from email discussions, and the editorial style changes suggested by 
Dan to conform to W3C guidelines, I have slightly re-worded the 
acknowledgements section several times, fixed minor typos when I see 
them, added some references, a new figure 1, and inserted some more 
text anchors.

I have left the version dated 23 September alone and since then added 
new versions with new URIs (two so far:
The latest version has a substantial change to the RDFS rules after 
Jos found a bug in them, and I am about to change the example just 
after the table to conform to that change, again as Jos pointed out.

>Thus I checked in the various
>snapshots I have grabbed of your work into my CVS so that I can see
>what version I reviewed and how the current doc differs.  The funky
>coloured CVS webdiff helps :)

Thanks. Neat tool, maybe I should get one.

>(I had to convert it to Unix line endings to do this)


>People might be interested in checking out
>   http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/rdfcore/mt/RDFMT-currentdraft.html
>The change so far are OK but I'd rather that the document was very
>stable before the final publication; any non non-style, typo or
>essential changes should be minimised.

Sure. I thought it was stable until Jos found a bug in the RDFS rules 
:-) I sincerely hope that there will be no more changes.

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 14:03:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:04 UTC