- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:46:59 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:31:38PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > > So far, we have been operating a policy that all test cases must > be approved by the WG and Art's WD correctly distinguishes between > test cases that have been approved and those that have not. > > The WD currently defines approval at the level of the directory. > We should not go adding test cases into a directory of approved > tests unless they have been approved. > > We need some mechanism to ensure that we distinguish between approved > and unapproved test cases. > > Art, would you like to suggest something here, or would you like me to? > > In the meantime, lets get this test case approved. Which I suppose > raises another question. Since the tests are not under a publicly-readable CVS archive, seems like the best we can do is to say that the only tests that were approved in the Sep 12 WD are in: [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/RDF-Test-Cases-2001-09-12.zip and that any test or directory not in [1] or is different than the same file in [1] has NOT been approved. > Art, would you like to take on the role of getting formal approval > for test cases? Seems like this should be a chair's responsiblity (perhaps as part of tele-conf decision).
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 08:48:03 UTC