Re: Zip files of test cases

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
[...]


> If we were to extend the test cases with different paradigms I would
> suggest:
> + the paradigm should be clear.
> + there should be no need to read a readme to understand a particular
> test
> + the different paradigms should be different top-level directories.


Right, I see what you mean.  You want an automatic way to determine
what sort of test to run on the data.


> 
> e.g. we copy all the current tests into a directory "syntax" leaving the
> internal structure unchanged, 


There is a rule that we don't create broken URI's so I'm relucant to move
the existing test cases.  But I'm sure we can work around that.


> Another paradigm I proposed earlier was "equality" where each test
> consisted of two or more RDF/XML files that contain the same model. I
> saw this as useful for testing xml:lang, which does not occur in
> N-triples.


Yet?  Am I right in assuming that the current direction the literal
discussion is taking will require a change to the representation of
literals in n-triples?

Brian

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2001 06:28:13 UTC