Thursday, 29 December 2005
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issue bnodeRef
- how to subsume or handle warnings?
- specifying one human-readable error/warning format?
- SPARQL semantics: open issue bnodeRef
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (bnodeRef)
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
Wednesday, 28 December 2005
Tuesday, 27 December 2005
- Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
- SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns
Wednesday, 21 December 2005
- extra DAWG teleconferences Thursdays in January 2006
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: minutes: RDF Data Access 20 Dec
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- rf1 editor's draft updated for 'collapsed' result format
Tuesday, 20 December 2005
- minutes: RDF Data Access 20 Dec
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: From the comments list: CONSTRUCT *
- RE: "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- RE: decimal/double test review? [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec
Monday, 19 December 2005
- decimal/double test review? [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec]
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec
- agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec
- Re: equating simple literal and xsd:string
- Re: "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral (useMentionOp, valueTesting)
- Re: "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral (useMentionOp, valueTesting)
- Re: "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral (useMentionOp, valueTesting)
- equating simple literal and xsd:string
- "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral
- Re: 06-12-2005 meeting DRAFT minutes attached
- Re: 06-12-2005 meeting DRAFT minutes attached
Friday, 16 December 2005
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
Thursday, 15 December 2005
- Re: Negative tests
- Re: putting entailment into SPARQL
- Re: Negative tests
- Re: Negative tests
- Negative tests
- Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)
- comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax?
Wednesday, 14 December 2005
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
Tuesday, 13 December 2005
- putting entailment into SPARQL
- Test #typepromotion-decimal-decimal-pass
- Re: decision on value testing
Tuesday, 6 December 2005
Tuesday, 13 December 2005
- Re: decision on value testing
- Decimal/double test updates done
- Re: decision on value testing
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
Monday, 12 December 2005
- agenda: RDF Data Access 13 Dec
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: 06-12-2005 meeting DRAFT minutes attached
- Re: decision on value testing
- decision on value testing
- agenda: RDF Data Access 13 Dec (in progress)
- regrets
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: not sure if we're done with: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
Friday, 9 December 2005
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: not sure if we're done with: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)
- Re: Question concerning typed literals in SPARQL
Wednesday, 7 December 2005
Tuesday, 6 December 2005
- floats, doubles, decimals and SWBP
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 06 Dec
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 06 Dec
Monday, 5 December 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 06 Dec
- agenda: RDF Data Access 06 Dec
- Re: Question concerning typed literals in SPARQL
- Re: Question concerning typed literals in SPARQL
Thursday, 1 December 2005
- Re: Question concerning typed literals in SPARQL
- Re: s/xsd:string/plain literal/g
- Re: s/xsd:string/plain literal/g
Wednesday, 30 November 2005
Tuesday, 29 November 2005
Monday, 28 November 2005
Sunday, 27 November 2005
Friday, 25 November 2005
Thursday, 24 November 2005
- Registration of media type application/sparql-query
- Registration of media type application/sparql-results+xml
- resolving inconsistencies in SPARQL Results mime registration
Wednesday, 23 November 2005
Tuesday, 22 November 2005
- Re: OK to use decimal for 0.3 in turtle?
- minutes 22 Nov
- regrets: Re: updated agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Nov
- Re: changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
- Re: OK to use decimal for 0.3 in turtle?
- Re: not sure if we're done with: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)
- Re: not sure if we're done with: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)
- Re: OK to use decimal for 0.3 in turtle?
- Re: WSDL with distint interfaces for return types
- Re: machine consumable SPARQL grammar
- another audit of SPARQL QL references
- Re: OK to use decimal for 0.3 in turtle?
- "RDF URI references" obsolete in favor of IRIs, no?
- SPARQL QL changes since 21 July LC WD
- spreading comment status into editor's drafts
- Re: WSDL with distint interfaces for return types
- Re: machine consumable SPARQL grammar
- not sure if we're done with: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)
- updated agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Nov
- agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Nov: in progress
Monday, 21 November 2005
- OK to use decimal for 0.3 in turtle?
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: regrets for Nov-22 telecon
- Re: From the comments list: CONSTRUCT *
- Re: regrets for Nov-22 telecon
- regrets for Nov-22 telecon
- From the comments list: CONSTRUCT *
Sunday, 20 November 2005
- Re: rq23 conformance section
- Re: rq23 conformance section
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: rq23 conformance section
Saturday, 19 November 2005
- Re: rq23 conformance section
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: rq23 conformance section
- Re: rq23 conformance section
- Re: fixing regex collations [Was: Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]]
Friday, 18 November 2005
- Re: fixing regex collations [Was: Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]]
- fixing regex collations [Was: Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]]
- Re: changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
- Re: changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
- Re: changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
- Re: changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
- Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- changes in XQuery and SPARQL's use of XQuery
Thursday, 17 November 2005
- Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- Decimal/Double update
- Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- Re: regrets for nov 22 telcon
- regrets for nov 22 telcon
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
- Re: DATATYPE("abc")=string? note
Wednesday, 16 November 2005
- Re: DATATYPE("abc")=string? note
- Re: query by reference
- Re: query by reference
- Re: query by reference
- Re: query by reference
- Re: query by reference
Tuesday, 15 November 2005
- 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note
- query by reference
- DATATYPE("abc")=string? note
- Meeting Minutes for Nov 15
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Nov: in progress
- regrets
- Regrets
Monday, 14 November 2005
- Re: str() and bNodes
- Re: test for DATATYPE on plain literals, please
- agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Nov: in progress
- Re: test for DATATYPE on plain literals, please
- Oddity in the SPARQL grammar. And Turtle.
- Re: test for DATATYPE on plain literals, please
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
Saturday, 12 November 2005
Friday, 11 November 2005
- return type of DATATYPE() [was: names for resources]
- Re: names for resources
- EBV
- Re: names for resources
- Partial response to: [Fwd: SPARQL Comments (Personal)]
- Re: names for resources
Thursday, 10 November 2005
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
- [Fwd: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2]
- [Fwd: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards]
Wednesday, 9 November 2005
- Re: Transitive properties (and accessingCollections, and rule WG)
- str() and bNodes
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: RDF semantics redux
Tuesday, 8 November 2005
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: Minutes of the DAWG telecon of 2005-11-08 for review
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Minutes of the DAWG telecon of 2005-11-08 for review
- Re: RDF semantics redux
- Transitive properties
- Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t. accessing RDF collections
- Re: RDF semantics redux
- Re: RDF semantics redux
- Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t. accessing RDF collections
- Re: regrets
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Nov **14:30Z**
- Re: regrets
- Re: RDF semantics redux
- RDF semantics redux
Monday, 7 November 2005
- Re: regrets
- Re: regrets
- Re: regrets
- Re: regrets
- Re: regrets
- handling SPARQL QL comments
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- regrets
- agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Nov **14:30Z**
- Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t. accessing RDF collections
Saturday, 5 November 2005
Friday, 4 November 2005
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: on SPARQL, various
- Re: on SPARQL, various
Thursday, 3 November 2005
- on SPARQL, various
- re: From the Data Access WG -- please review draft of SPARQL protocol in WSDL 1.1
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- in support of postponing countAggregate
Wednesday, 2 November 2005
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- Re: On told-bnodes in queries
- On told-bnodes in queries
- SPARQL over OWL DL
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
Tuesday, 1 November 2005
- new issue? HTML forms and SPARQL
- Minutes for DAWG telecon 2005-Nov-01
- Re: SPARQL Semantics document
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Nov ***14:30Z*** 9:30amET
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Nov
- Re: SPARQL Semantics document
Monday, 31 October 2005
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Nov
- Re: SPARQL Semantics document
- agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Nov
- minutes RDF Data Access 2005-10-25 for review
- Re: Small errors in SPARQL Protocol examples
- Re: binary query results format, draft
Sunday, 30 October 2005
Thursday, 27 October 2005
- Re: binary query results format, draft
- binary query results format, draft
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
Wednesday, 26 October 2005
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Leaving the working group
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: valueTesting followup action (AndyS)
- Re: valueTesting followup action (AndyS)
- valueTesting followup action (AndyS)
- please chip in on SPARQL comment handling
Tuesday, 25 October 2005
- From the Data Access WG -- please review draft of SPARQL protocol in WSDL 1.1
- are SPARQL queries unicode?
- Good bye for now
- Re: ISSUE: Security Considerations
- Regrets for Oct 25 and Nov 1, 2005
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- ISSUE: Security Considerations
Monday, 24 October 2005
- regrets for tue oct 25
- Small errors in SPARQL Protocol examples
- SPARQL Semantics document
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section
- Re: Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section
- agenda: RDF Data Access 25 Oct (in progress, at risk)
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
Saturday, 22 October 2005
- Re: layout changes in operator mapping and descriptions
- Re: layout changes in operator mapping and descriptions
Friday, 21 October 2005
- Meeting Record 18 Oct 2005
- layout changes in operator mapping and descriptions
- Leaving the working group
- [off] Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
Tuesday, 18 October 2005
- Latest change to WSDL 1.1 - wsdl:import to xs:import
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 18 Oct
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 18 Oct
- Introduction again (new affiliations)
- Re: machine consumable SPARQL grammar
- Re: machine consumable SPARQL grammar
- Re: some options for issues#rdfSemantics
- Re: some options for issues#rdfSemantics
Monday, 17 October 2005
- Re: WSDL with distint interfaces for return types
- agenda: RDF Data Access 18 Oct
- machine consumable SPARQL grammar
- some options for issues#rdfSemantics
- Re: review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)
- agenda: RDF Data Access 18 Oct (in progress)
- Re: review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)
- Re: progress on WSDL 1.1 actions
- review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)
Friday, 14 October 2005
- Re: progress on WSDL 1.1 actions
- Re: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update
- Re: isIRI or isURI
- Re: Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
Thursday, 13 October 2005
Wednesday, 12 October 2005
Monday, 10 October 2005
Tuesday, 11 October 2005
- Re: 2005-October-11 Minutes
- 2005-October-11 Minutes
- Re: Section 11 notes
- WSDL with distint interfaces for return types
- test schema issues
- Re: isIRI or isURI
- Re: [edits in 1.505] reworking errors SPARQL Query
- isIRI or isURI
- Re: [edits in 1.505] reworking errors SPARQL Query
- [edits in 1.505] reworking errors SPARQL Query
- Re: Type errors with xsd:boolean arguments
- Section 11 notes
Monday, 10 October 2005
- Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experiencew.r.t.accessing RDF collections
- Re: Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
- truth tables per Sep 13 resolution
- Re: Type errors with xsd:boolean arguments
- lang-match proposal
- agenda: RDF Data Access 11 Oct
- RE: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experiencew.r.t.accessing RDF collections
- RE: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t.accessing RDF collections
- RE: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t.accessing RDF collections
- [edits in 1.501] redefining a namespace prefix and Base IRI definition
Sunday, 9 October 2005
- Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t. accessing RDF collections
- summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience w.r.t. accessing RDF collections
Saturday, 8 October 2005
Friday, 7 October 2005
- Re: Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
- Re: Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
- RE: XSD decimal syntax
- Re: Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
- XSD decimal syntax
- Re: ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)
- Issue #rdfSemantics / #owlDisjunction
- Re: ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)
Thursday, 6 October 2005
- ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)
- Re: SPARQL tests among Most popular invalid documents on www.w3.org (2005-10-06 at 11:10 GMT)
- SPARQL tests among Most popular invalid documents on www.w3.org (2005-10-06 at 11:10 GMT)
- [Fwd: Re: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax]
Wednesday, 5 October 2005
Tuesday, 4 October 2005
- Minutes of the DAWG telecon of 2005-10-04
- Re: rdfSemantics null hypothesis: punt/postpone
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 4 Oct
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: rdfSemantics null hypothesis: punt/postpone
- SOAP extensibility (WSDL question)
- Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- leaving the working group
Monday, 3 October 2005
- allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results?
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 4 Oct
- Re: rdfSemantics null hypothesis: punt/postpone
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 4 Oct
- Re: rdfSemantics null hypothesis: punt/postpone
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 4 Oct
- toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases... schedule review
- rdfSemantics null hypothesis: punt/postpone
- agenda: RDF Data Access 4 Oct