- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:36:28 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20051122123628.GL17026@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:45:19AM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > > Dan Connolly wrote: > >Andy, you wrote: > > > >"... There wil be a formal response to your email > >when all the comments have been acted on." > > > >and I'm not sure if anything relevant has happened since then. > >Any clues? > > > > All the edit changes (sec 8/9/10) are done from: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0011.html > > Eric - what's the status of the comments on sec 11? The first example in 11.2.3.1 for sop:RDFterm-equal should have two results in the query results section, with the inverse solution as well as the listed, since name1=>Ms A. and name2=>Alice is just as valid a binding. fixed http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#conformanceB The second example in 11.2.3.1 has a typo, the time in the data should be 19:00, not 19:01 like listed, to get the results expected. fixed http://unagi/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#func-RDFterm-equal The first example in 11.2.3.2 has several problems, so it's best to re-examine it. Namely, the FILTER construct is missing a parenthesis (or should have the outside one removed) and the example appears to be projecting an undefined variable for no reason. fixed http://unagi/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#func-isBound The second example in 11.2.3.2 should have foaf:givenName as the predicate, not foaf:name. aha, tx fixed http://unagi/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#func-isBound The query under section 11 Testing Values should probably read "?date > ..." and not "?date < ...". Otherwise, the same result will be returned in both examples, since neither of the dates in the data will test true, no matter whether the casting works or not. fixed http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests I note that when I ran the LC version, I got no results. The example in 11.2.3.6 should read "FILTER regex(?name...", not "FILTER regex(name..." fixed http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#funcex-regex This may actually present some issues in general, but example 11.2.3.8 has a statement ""FILTER (lang(?name) = "ES" ) )"". Technically, "ES" will parse to a untyped literal and the LANG function returns a xsd:string, which will by the constraints of the language result in a literal compare, which will fail in all cases. To be technically accurate, it should read ""FILTER (lang(?name) = str("ES") ) )"". dang, he's right um, need to think a bit... -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:36:33 UTC