- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:38:55 -0500
- To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna.biz>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > There are still a number of possible reasons I can think of to stick > with the last call design however: > > 1. It has been implemented already and changing it will break > existing tools (but hey, we're a working draft, what do you > expect?). > 2. The collapsed form esp. will make the data structure more > irregular and therefore possibly harder to understand, esp. for > people with table/SQL background. > > I personally find neither reason particularly compelling, but I'd like > to hear the WG's opinion on this, if any. I agree, neither reason is compelling (and I'm not even sure I agree with them, but that's beside the point). Cheers, Kendall
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 15:39:07 UTC