Re: Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section

On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:38 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> We have a coment asking for a conformancy section in SPARQL Query:
> DanC, you hvae argued that we should leave conformance to the protocol
> spec (or an argument near that).

I've argued that the QL spec should specify conformance of documents
and answers to the QL syntax and semantics,
and that the protocol spec should specify conformance to the protocol.

>  I think the WG has tacitly or
> activley agreed. Could you send mail to the commentor arguing your
> position?

No; I think the comment is editorial; it's asking for a different
form of emphasis on the conformance stuff. I leave that to
the editors.

p.s. if you want to send mail that I notice as addressed to me
in particular, don't use; use

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 14:31:47 UTC