W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol Test Suite Update

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:33:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4358C409.2080101@hp.com>
To: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


Any chance of using the same minfest vocabulary as for the query language 
tests?  It means the same manifest parser can be used for the both - this is 
what has just bitten me.

A manifest [1] is a list of tests - each test is an action and a result.  That 
is slightly different to the ptest where the dataset, the query, the preferred 
result and the acceptType are all properties off of the test itself.

If that manifest vocabulary doesn't work for you, I suggest we change the 
manifest RDFS to create a reused piece of vocabulary.

Apologies - I should have followed through on this [2] and not left it so 
late.  My fault.

It's not a road block - I could just copy the code and tweak it to work with 
the ptest vocabulary.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0248.html

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:02 -0400, Elias Torres wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>I wanted to update you on work I started to get a protocol test suite
> Much appreciated.
>> any advice/direction is gladly welcomed.
> Here's hoping I get time to study this closely soon.
> Everybody else, please join the fun!
> Gold star to the 1st person to reproduce Elias's results.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 10:33:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC