- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:33:45 +0100
- To: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Elias, Any chance of using the same minfest vocabulary as for the query language tests? It means the same manifest parser can be used for the both - this is what has just bitten me. A manifest [1] is a list of tests - each test is an action and a result. That is slightly different to the ptest where the dataset, the query, the preferred result and the acceptType are all properties off of the test itself. If that manifest vocabulary doesn't work for you, I suggest we change the manifest RDFS to create a reused piece of vocabulary. Apologies - I should have followed through on this [2] and not left it so late. My fault. It's not a road block - I could just copy the code and tweak it to work with the ptest vocabulary. Andy [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest# [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0248.html Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:02 -0400, Elias Torres wrote: > >> >> >> >>Hi all, >> >>I wanted to update you on work I started to get a protocol test suite >>going, > > > Much appreciated. > > >> any advice/direction is gladly welcomed. > > > Here's hoping I get time to study this closely soon. > > Everybody else, please join the fun! > > Gold star to the 1st person to reproduce Elias's results. >
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 10:33:55 UTC