Re: progress on WSDL 1.1 actions

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:55:48PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:52 -0400, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Everyone, 
> > 
> > I've asked Kendall and Eric to review the latest draft of the WSDL 1.1
> > Note and, of course, the WSDL itself now available at: 
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wsdl11/ 
> > 
> > Kendall was able to give a "semi-cursory" thumbs-up to the WSDL before
> > he had to go away this past week. 
> 
> That leaves Eric. He seems to be struggling to swap this in.
> 
> Can anybody else take a look at it and say "indeed, there's
> nothing scary in there; I think it's OK to publish, as
> a 1st draft"?

I finally got to this. I am waiting for a word from Hugo about
"equivilence" between WSDL1.1 and WSDL2 . Apart from that, there's
only a minor proceedural issue in the comments.

> > I've also added a good bit of expository text at: 
> > 
> > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SparqlProtocolWsdl11Examples 
> 
> Indeed!
> 
> I was hoping to play with some of the toys described there,
> but I'm drowning in other stuff.
> 
> > This text links to a fully working Java sample client that executes
> > SPARQL queries via SOAP over HTTP. It also explains how the code
> > works. The sections on a python sample and a C# sample will hopefully
> > be filled in this coming week. 
> > 
> > This partially satisfies: 
> > 
> > ACTION: Lee to elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff
> > with tools 
> 
> It's done to my satisfaction.
> > 
> > ...but as I'm planning to fill in the python and C# parts of the Wiki
> > page, I'd be happy to keep this action open for the time being. 
> > 
> > The other two relevant actions: 
> > 
> > ACTION: KC, EricP to review WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol
> > publication candidate, once a candidate pointer is mailed to the WG
> > 
> > ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
> > contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias 
> >
> > are waiting on a thumbs-up from Eric and any other interested WG
> > members.
> 
> I'll take a thumbs-up from Eric *or* any other interested WG member,
> at this point.
> 
> >  Elias and I are OK with the current state of the Note, I believe, but
> > would definitely appreciate any second (or third) sets of eyes. 
> > 
> > 
> > hope everyone enjoy[s|ed] your weekends, 
> > Lee

-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.