- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:46:06 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
According to latest word from the WSDL WG, the (standard) URI for our interface will be... http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery) i.e. something that can't be used as a qname in RDF/XML nor turtle. Is that good enough? I need to say within the next week or so if not. I can't think if any show-stopper reason why not, though it sure isn't pretty. For details, the thread starts with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0009 and culminates with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/0013 This is mostly related to serviceDescription, which we've postponed. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription But by the time we (or somebody like us) pick it up, it'll be too late to give technical input on WSDL 2.0. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 20:46:15 UTC