- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:00:49 -0400
- To: jmarsh@microsoft.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFEE5AC92A.C75B52E6-ON852570A5.00767428-852570A5.0078EB69@us.ibm.com>
Hello Jonathan, The Data Access Working Group has published a working draft, "SPARQL Protocol for RDF Using WSDL 1.1" at: http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/ >From the draft's abstract: """ The RDF Data Access Working Group normatively defines the SPARQL Protocol for RDF via a Web Services Description Language version 2.0 (WSDL 2.0) definition. This document presents a non-normative WSDL 1.1 document defining the same protocol. """ The target status of this document is a Working Group Note, but until then we are soliciting comments and feedback on the document from experts and the community. In that vein, we would very much appreciate it if the Web Services Description Working Group is able to review the Working Draft and the associated WSDL 1.1 document ( http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl ). In particular, we would like to ensure that we do not have any egregious misuse of WSDL 1.1, and we are also interested in assuring that the SOAP HTTP requests conforming to this WSDL 1.1 description match those produced from the SOAP-over-HTTP bindings in the normative WSDL 2 definitions ( http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl ). Note fyi that the Working Draft links to a community-writeable wiki topic which contains some of our early experiences in using the WSDL 1.1 document with existing tooling. many thanks for any help you can provide, Lee -- Lee Feigenbaum feigenbl@us.ibm.com IBM Software Engineer - Internet Technology Group 617-693-3765
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 22:00:56 UTC