Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs]

On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 18:24 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Proposed reply:
> Outstanding: Things in [[ ]] below:
> + Do we want to link to

Hmm... that doesn't look straightforward to do.
I'm inclined to just leave it be without citing it from the SPARQL spec.

> + Eric/Dan: please suggest text for 5

Well, I'm sympathetic to what Ashok asks for here.
I think xsd:anyURI is the right datatype.

Eric, the ball is yours.

> + EricP - coudl you confirm the namespace comment (near end) is fixed and
>    that I fixed the query in correctly.  Thanks.
> I added an example to rq23 for reification.

Cool. thanks.

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 23:32:47 UTC