- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:21:59 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > To reply to two points at once; you asked for clarification of in > what way > the collapsed option is not fully-functional. It is not fully > functional > in that it does not support position-based indexing as the LC > design does. Thanks, Lee. Thought that's what you meant. > > If that is not a desirable property, then I believe that the best > approach > is to eliminate this requirement from the results format (and then > going > with option 'c' is less objectionable). I find that I do no desire it, nor do I object to it. :> Cheers, Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 17:27:42 UTC