Re: on SPARQL, various

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I just discovered these comments that weren't sent to us.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0107.html
> 
> A couple quick notes
> 
> "8)  There does not seem to be any way to force a literal into the  
> variable position in a binding."
> 
> I think isLiteral() will do what you want there.
> 
> 
> "3)  UNSAID would have been of great concern with regards to  
> scalability, just in case it comes back :)"
> 
> It never left. It's called UNBOUND with OPTIONAL, but it's
> in there.

It doesn't even need BOUND.  The expression

    (?x = 3) || ! ( ?x = 3 )

will do.

 Andy

> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 10:06:12 UTC