W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: On told-bnodes in queries

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:55:42 -0600
Message-Id: <p06230902bf9561359e19@[]>
To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:02 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>G simply entails ...
>Why do you keep saying "simply entails"? There should be general 
>entailment, of which simple entailment is a special case.

That is a separate debate from the other issue of how to handle 
bnodes, but my own view is that the SPARQL standard should not in 
fact specify any form of entailment beyond simple (or at most RDF) 
entailment, in this round. But let us leave that issue aside for now, 
and focus on handling bnodes.



IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 19:55:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC