- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:55:42 -0600
- To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:02 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > >>G simply entails ... > >Why do you keep saying "simply entails"? There should be general >entailment, of which simple entailment is a special case. That is a separate debate from the other issue of how to handle bnodes, but my own view is that the SPARQL standard should not in fact specify any form of entailment beyond simple (or at most RDF) entailment, in this round. But let us leave that issue aside for now, and focus on handling bnodes. Pat >--e. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 19:55:54 UTC