regrets

Due to conflicting business request,
I have to send my regrets for today's telecon.

Best,
Yoshio Fukushige
fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
To: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:39 AM
Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Nov: in progress


> 
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>  2005-11-15T14:30Z
> 
>  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/11/15-dawg-irc
> 
> scribe: VOLUNTEER PLEASE
> 
>  record for review:
> Minutes of the DAWG telecon of 2005-11-08 for review
> Janne Saarela (Tuesday, 8 November)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0193.html
> plus my comments
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0198.html
> 
> 
> next meeting: @@
> note the following done without discussion: @@
> continue the following without discussion: @@
> comments on agenda?
> 
> Ugh... I really should have done this on Friday.
> 
> Unordered items that occur to me now:
> 
> ** toward updated SPARQL QL WD
> 
> ** issues#rdfSemantics
> 
> Ugh... I had hoped to have a clear proposal in this agenda
> 
> ** decimal vs float for 0.3
> 
> gotta count the positions
> 
> ** issues#valueTesting
> 
> doesn't seem to want to stay closed
> 
> ** issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
> 
> any news? should I give this any time this week?
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 12:01:46 UTC