- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:55:28 +0000
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:06:24AM -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > >>On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:52:40AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>>On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >>> >>>>The WG decided to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus >>>>... today. The note was to reflect a disagreement between Andy >>>>and myself about Effective Boolean Value. I wanted to stick with >>>>the XQuery semantics but Andy pointed out that they changed since >>>>I used them to establish the SPARQL EBV rules. >>> >>>Hmm... before or after XQuery went to last call? >> >>dunno. should have looked then, but i didn't >> >> >>>Did they highlight the change in a changes section of their CR? >>>I wonder if they have a test case that ensures that implementors >>>will notice the change. >> >>I'm inclined to let this bookkeeping/auditing detail drop unless >>I come accross relevent facts while recovering now. > > > I put together some notes about how XQuery evaluation works [XT], but > haven't checked the XQuery, XPath, and XPath F&O change logs. > > >>>>The previous rules >>>>were basically, TRUE for all but a few known types with known FALSE >>>>values. The new rules have type errors for all but known types. I'm >>>>happy to switch to the new rules, but the WG voted on the old ones. >>>>DanC, advice? >>>> >>> >>>Please just add some (more) "red text" about this ... anything that you >>>and Andy >>>are both comfortable publishing... and continue toward publication. >> >>Sounds good; working on that now. > > > Added issue text to 11.2.1 Invocation [INV] and 11.2.2 Effective > Boolean Value [EBV]. Andy, are you up late tonight? No. > I think your > OK completes the editorial part of: > PROPOSED: to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus > rdfs:Datatype/DATATYPE change in table, DATATYPE("abc")=string? > note, plus, we hope, edited changelog by DanC > (though feedback is expected and appreciated). I have read the chnages and they look good to publish. Andy > > > [XT] http://www.w3.org/2005/11/XQueryTour/ > [INV] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#invocation > [EBV] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#ebv
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 09:55:42 UTC