- From: Yoshio Fukushige <fuku@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:57:30 -0000
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Regrets for being away in Galway Best, Yoshio Fukushige fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com fuku@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> To: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:33 PM Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access 8 Nov **14:30Z** > > hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda > > plain text: > > 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda > + [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-11-08T14:30Z > ([2]local times note the time change!) > o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 > + supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg > o [5]log to appear > + scribe: JanneS > + roll call ([6]wg membership) regrets: > + PROPOSED: to accept [7]DAWG Weekly -- 1 Nov 2005 as a true > record > + Let's note these done without discussion: @@ > + Let's continue these without discussion: @@ > + Comments on the agenda? > Ugh... I'm drowning in comment status. Gonna have to figure out something > better. > 2. next meeting: 15 Nov conflicts with XML 2005. When is the next > time we have critical mass? note pre-AC publication cut-off of > 21 Nov. > 3. Security Considerations > + cf [8]eric 25 Oct, [9]22 Jul comment > + ACTION: EricP to respond to "Security Considerations" > comment. also: > + ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to > protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the > section in rq23 itself > 4. QL Conformance > + comment: [10]W3C QA Guidelines conformance > + discussion: up to [11]connolly 24 Oct > 5. toward SPARQL QL updated WD > + ACTION: ericP to respond to [12]isURI poorly named. also: > o [13]SPARQL: Error handling > o [14]SPARQL: language tag issues > + comment: [15]from the XML Query and the XSL WGs > + comment: [16]format based on Unicode? > + QL comments: [17]General Document Comments,[18]Querying the > Dataset, [19]Semantics of queries involving named graphs, > [20]section 2, [21]Example Errors, [22]sections 3 onwards, > [23]twinql Retrospective > 6. issues#rdfSemantics > + ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft, > listing what will change with the new semantics > understanding, and what will not > + ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft, > listing what will change with the new semantics > understanding ... > o note [24]SPARQL Semantics document Enrico Franconi > (Monday, 24 October) > + ACTION Bijan: estimate impact of "abstract syntax > entailment" etc. on WG test harness > o for reference: [25]Oedipus test case (OWL-DL > semantics) > + ACTION: PatH to review [26]The Semantics of SPARQL > + ACTION: PatH to sketch tests that characterize impact of > semantics work [eta "2 weeks", i.e. 8 Nov... during ISWC. > hmm.] > 7. issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol > + ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL > comments > + ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t. > WSDL 2.0 constraints > + ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of > SPARQL protocol > 8. Toward CR > + cf [27]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases... > schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October) > + ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in protocol > spec > + [28]lc status: as of 1.34 2005/10/26 04:51:06 (there are a > few comments newer than that): > o 18 closed :) > o 12 pending: > # 8 pending a reply from the commentor: > QuotedIRIref too lax , ORDER with IRIs, > incorrect/confusing example in 9.3, BASE IRI > resolution, Backslashes in string literals, > Please make sure the grammar is directly machine > consumable, acknowledge prior art, Editorial > comments on Last Call WD > # 1 where the commentor gave further editorial > information for consideration by the protocol > editor: SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS > # 3 where the commentor supplies further > information for consideration by the WG: > @ Charmod conformance; my [29]OK? message has > a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer > asks for I18N WG review in reply > @ External storage of queries reminds me that > we owe ietf-types a review of our MIME > types. DaveB tried but ran into list admin > foo. > @ Query forms should be resources, not > operations [30]baker 5Sep, [31]baker 6 Sep > o 41 open: > # 1 for the chair to clean up thread-state: Roman > Numeral test > # 1 that I just sent an [OK?] message about: need > extar information in SPARQL > # 3 connect to valueTesting which we just closed 25 > Oct with actions on EricP, I think: language tag > issues, Error handling, isURI poorly named > # 8 clearly editorial: > @ protocol: typo and general, Style for PRE > boxes, Wrong SOAP namespace, WSDL comments > on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft, WSDL comments > on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft > @ query results: rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS > styling, Query Results XML Format typo > # 2 connected to open wsdlAbstractProtocol issue: > Protocol Review and Comments, Note about WSDL2 > Binding > # 4 clearly-substantive requests for WG > consideration: > @ results format: SPARQL Results Format and > Unbound Variables, Broad application of CSS > hypertext pseudo-classes > @ QL: from the XML Query and the XSL WGs, > format based on Unicode?, Security > Considerations > @ protocol: Security Considerations > # 5 connected to an open WG issue, rdfSemantics: > Barstow, pfps x3, entailment, soundness, > completeness > # 10 possibly substantive, possibly editorial: > @ QL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance,General > Document Comments,Querying the Dataset, > Semantics of queries involving named graphs, > section 2, Example Errors, sections 3 > onwards > - 1 for the chair or a QL editor to check > that we've handled it all and send an > [OK?] message: twinql Retrospective > @ protocol: on SPARQL protocol document > 9. protocol testing update > + ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing > results > 10. test suite maintenance > + ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with > negative tests [recorded in > [32]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16] > + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on > op:dateTime triple > + ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from > comment on truth tables in [33]commentor's message > + ACTION ericP: to update sop:isIRI to include the "isuri" > synonym > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > [2] > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=08&month=11&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0 > [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200 > [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/11/08-dawg-irc > [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who > [7] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/att-0145/01-dawg-minutes.html > [8] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0108.html > [9] http://www.w3.org/mid/43203939.225674421@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [10] http://www.w3.org/mid/4310388e.225502812@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [11] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0102.html > [12] http://www.w3.org/mid/431c391c.225645515@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [13] http://www.w3.org/mid/43265240.232080796@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [14] http://www.w3.org/mid/431338a1.225522296@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [15] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc > [16] http://www.w3.org/mid/43046b29.399234875@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > [17] > http://www.w3.org/mid/97C9F8341808C244BFF39DCB6EDD5AD71116B2@server.home.ryan.levering.name > [18] http://www.w3.org/mid/4314ACF4.8020308@oracle.com > [19] http://www.w3.org/mid/43165DA2.3020801@oracle.com > [20] http://www.w3.org/mid/4316E5B7.3030100@ninebynine.org > [21] > http://www.w3.org/mid/97C9F8341808C244BFF39DCB6EDD5AD71116EA@server.home.ryan.levering.name > [22] http://www.w3.org/mid/4322D7FF.2000701@ninebynine.org > [23] > http://www.w3.org/mid/5D97B907-ADAE-4F78-9168-AD655D5D3887@reading.ac.uk > [24] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html > [25] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0498.html > [26] http://www.inf.unibz.it/krdb/w3c/sparql/ > [27] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html > [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html > [29] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost > [30] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050905003622.GR17056@markbaker.ca > [31] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050906021726.GE17056@markbaker.ca > [32] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16 > [33] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 09:56:55 UTC