- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:18:09 +0100
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- CC: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Kendall Clark wrote: > On 13:29, Mon 24 Oct 05, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > >>== "select-refused" >> >>Not sure why the query is to be refused. >> >>I'd return a 400 (BAD REQUEST) if query is sent that the (mythical) service >>description had said it was not supported in some way (e.g. described >>dataset but the service only has a fixed dataset). It is not a server >>error if the client sends a request the server has said it can't handle. > > > This is *really* a comment against the protocol spec, isn't it? One I've > heard from and discussed with Steve a long time ago (well, relatively > speaking), and one we discussed during the telcon on IRC last week. I am reporting what I discovered in trying to reproduce the test suite that Elias has spent time creating. We discussed the general principle in the telecon. Here, I was wondering if this were the right return code for this particular test. Andy
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 14:18:15 UTC