- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:14:42 -0400
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:27:23AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > I've been trying to see what WSDL consumers can do, comparing the > current WSDL, with one opertion, to another with two operations, one > for each return type. My goal is to sufficiently describe SPARQL so > that a tool can set up an appropriate handler for the response. These changes seem vitiated by the resolution of WS-Desc's LC337, near as I can tell. > I'm not done with my homework yet, but wanted folks to see what I was > working with. An ugly blow up in the # of bindings is the first thing I see. I don't really see the point, as I said above, given the changes coming in WSDL. But YMMV. Cheers, Kendall -- Sad songs and waltzes aren't selling this year... --Cake
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 20:16:59 UTC