- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:05:00 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:58:15 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > The turtle thing is a big deal, if 1.0 is a decimal, then: > > SELECT * WHERE { [] rdf:value 1.0 . } > > does not match > > [] rdf:value 1.0 . > > > > That's a big drawback IMHO. > > You don't think turtle would follow SPARQL and migrate to decimal? I dont know that. If I had an assurance that turtle would change inline with SPARQL syntax then I probably wouldn't object to this change. Its a pretty major change to the practical use of SPARQL though. I'd probably decide to change my engine to internally prefer decimals over doubles, which I'm not that keen on. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 17:05:40 UTC