- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:44:50 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
oops... this LCWD http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ cite and editor's draft version of the results format. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ It should have cited the published WD. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20050801/ Ah... it seems there are essentially no differences betwen them, so maybe it doesn't matter too much. But let's get that fixed for next time. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 17:44:56 UTC