- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:27:10 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
+ [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-11-01T14:30Z
([2]local times note the time change!)
o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg
o [5]log to appear
+ scribe: JanneS
+ roll call ([6]wg membership) regrets: EricP
+ PROPOSED: to accept [7]DAWG Weekly -- 25 Oct 2005 as a true
record
+ Let's note these done without discussion:
o ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias.
[8]DONE
o LeeF to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 SPARQL protocol
stuff, once it is available. [9]DONE
+ Let's continue these without discussion:
o ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest
with negative tests [recorded in
[10]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
o ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
o ACTION: EricP to respond to "Security Considerations"
comment
o ACTION: ericP to respond to [11]isURI poorly named
o ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in
protocol spec
o ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case
from comment on truth tables in [12]commentor's
message
o ACTION: AndyS to Update grammar inline with value
testing decision
o ACTION ericP: to update sop:isIRI to include the
"isuri" synonym
+ Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late. I hope to get thru
to LC comment status quickly
2. next meeting: 8 Nov conflicts with ISWC. 15 Nov conflicts with
XML 2005. When is the next time we have critical mass? note
pre-AC publication cut-off of 21 Nov. See also "toward CR" item
below.
3. Note on querying lists
+ cf [13]summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience
w.r.t. accessing RDF collections jos.deroo@agfa.com
(Sunday, 9 October)
4. protocol testing update
+ ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
results
5. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
+ ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t.
WSDL 2.0 constraints
+ ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL
comments
+ ACTION: KendallC to Send review of SPARQL protocol spec
from WS-Desc to DAWG list.
6. Security Considerations
+ cf [14]eric 25 Oct, [15]22 Jul comment
+ ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
section in rq23 itself
7. issues#rdfSemantics
+ ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding, and what will not
+ ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding ...
o note [16]SPARQL Semantics document Enrico Franconi
(Monday, 24 October)
+ ACTION Bijan: estimate impact of "abstract syntax
entailment" etc. on WG test harness
o for reference: [17]Oedipus test case (OWL-DL
semantics)
+ ACTION: PatH to review [18]The Semantics of SPARQL
+ ACTION: PatH to sketch tests that characterize impact of
semantics work [eta "2 weeks", i.e. 8 Nov... during ISWC.
hmm.]
8. Toward CR
+ cf [19]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
+ [20]lc status: as of 1.34 (there are a few comments newer
than that):
o 18 closed :)
o 11 pending:
# 1 where the chair just needs to tidy the thread
state:Some typos in WD
# 6 pending a reply from the commentor:
QuotedIRIref too lax , ORDER with IRIs,
incorrect/confusing example in 9.3, BASE IRI
resolution, Backslashes in string literals,
Please make sure the grammar is directly machine
consumable
# 1 where the commentor gave further editorial
information for consideration by the protocol
editor: SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS
# 3 where the commentor supplies further
information for consideration by the WG:
@ Charmod conformance; my [21]OK? message has
a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer
asks for I18N WG review in reply
@ External storage of queries reminds me that
we owe ietf-types a review of our MIME
types. DaveB tried but ran into list admin
foo.
@ Query forms should be resources, not
operations [22]baker 5Sep, [23]baker 6 Sep
o 34 open:
# 1 for the chair to clean up thread-state: Roman
Numeral test
# 1 that's more of a how-to that Andy partly
redirected; chair (or helper) should either close
the thread or explicitly ask if the commentor is
happy to take their question elsewhere: need
extar information in SPARQL
# 3 connect to valueTesting which we just closed 25
Oct with actions on EricP, I think: language tag
issues, Error handling, isURI poorly named
# 8 clearly editorial:
@ protocol: typo and general, Style for PRE
boxes, Wrong SOAP namespace, WSDL comments
on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft
@ query results: rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS
styling, Query Results XML Format typo
@ QL: acknowledge prior art, Editorial
comments on Last Call WD from ivan,
# 2 connected to WSDL 2.0 changes we requested,
pending one more reply from WSD WG: Protocol
Review and Comments, Note about WSDL2 Binding
# 4 clearly-substantive requests for WG
consideration:
@ results format: SPARQL Results Format and
Unbound Variables, Broad application of CSS
hypertext pseudo-classes
@ QL: from the XML Query and the XSL WGs,
format based on Unicode?
# 5 connected to an open WG issue, rdfSemantics:
Barstow, pfps x3, entailment, soundness,
completeness
# 10 possibly substantive, possibly editorial:
@ QL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance, Security
Considerations, General Document
Comments,Querying the Dataset, Semantics of
queries involving named graphs, section 2,
Example Errors, sections 3 onwards
- 1 for the chair or a QL editor to check
that we've handled it all and send an
[OK?] message: twinql Retrospective
@ protocol: on SPARQL protocol document
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=01&month=11&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[5] http://www.w3.org/2005/11/01-dawg-irc
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
[7] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-dawg-minutes
[8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-sprot11-20051024/
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0114.html
[10] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
[11] http://www.w3.org/mid/431c391c.225645515@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0033.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0108.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/mid/43203939.225674421@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0498.html
[18] http://www.inf.unibz.it/krdb/w3c/sparql/
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[22] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050905003622.GR17056@markbaker.ca
[23] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050906021726.GE17056@markbaker.ca
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 21:27:21 UTC