W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 1 Nov

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:27:10 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1130794030.27261.872.camel@dirk>

Hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda

plain text:

    1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
          + [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-11-01T14:30Z
            ([2]local times note the time change!)
               o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
          + supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg
               o [5]log to appear
          + scribe: JanneS
          + roll call ([6]wg membership) regrets: EricP
          + PROPOSED: to accept [7]DAWG Weekly -- 25 Oct 2005 as a true
          + Let's note these done without discussion:
               o ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
                 contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias.
               o LeeF to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 SPARQL protocol
                 stuff, once it is available. [9]DONE
          + Let's continue these without discussion:
               o ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest
                 with negative tests [recorded in
               o ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
                 op:dateTime triple
               o ACTION: EricP to respond to "Security Considerations"
               o ACTION: ericP to respond to [11]isURI poorly named
               o ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in
                 protocol spec
               o ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case
                 from comment on truth tables in [12]commentor's
               o ACTION: AndyS to Update grammar inline with value
                 testing decision
               o ACTION ericP: to update sop:isIRI to include the
                 "isuri" synonym
          + Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late. I hope to get thru
            to LC comment status quickly
    2. next meeting: 8 Nov conflicts with ISWC. 15 Nov conflicts with
       XML 2005. When is the next time we have critical mass? note
       pre-AC publication cut-off of 21 Nov. See also "toward CR" item
    3. Note on querying lists
          + cf [13]summary of some cwm/euler implementation experience
            w.r.t. accessing RDF collections jos.deroo@agfa.com
            (Sunday, 9 October)
    4. protocol testing update
          + ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
    5. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
          + ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t.
            WSDL 2.0 constraints
          + ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL
          + ACTION: KendallC to Send review of SPARQL protocol spec
            from WS-Desc to DAWG list.
    6. Security Considerations
          + cf [14]eric 25 Oct, [15]22 Jul comment
          + ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
            http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
            protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
            section in rq23 itself
    7. issues#rdfSemantics
          + ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft,
            listing what will change with the new semantics
            understanding, and what will not
          + ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft,
            listing what will change with the new semantics
            understanding ...
               o note [16]SPARQL Semantics document Enrico Franconi
                 (Monday, 24 October)
          + ACTION Bijan: estimate impact of "abstract syntax
            entailment" etc. on WG test harness
               o for reference: [17]Oedipus test case (OWL-DL
          + ACTION: PatH to review [18]The Semantics of SPARQL
          + ACTION: PatH to sketch tests that characterize impact of
            semantics work [eta "2 weeks", i.e. 8 Nov... during ISWC.
    8. Toward CR
          + cf [19]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
            schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
          + [20]lc status: as of 1.34 (there are a few comments newer
            than that):
               o 18 closed :)
               o 11 pending:
                    # 1 where the chair just needs to tidy the thread
                      state:Some typos in WD
                    # 6 pending a reply from the commentor:
                      QuotedIRIref too lax , ORDER with IRIs,
                      incorrect/confusing example in 9.3, BASE IRI
                      resolution, Backslashes in string literals,
                      Please make sure the grammar is directly machine
                    # 1 where the commentor gave further editorial
                      information for consideration by the protocol
                      editor: SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS
                    # 3 where the commentor supplies further
                      information for consideration by the WG:
                         @ Charmod conformance; my [21]OK? message has
                           a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer
                           asks for I18N WG review in reply
                         @ External storage of queries reminds me that
                           we owe ietf-types a review of our MIME
                           types. DaveB tried but ran into list admin
                         @ Query forms should be resources, not
                           operations [22]baker 5Sep, [23]baker 6 Sep
               o 34 open:
                    # 1 for the chair to clean up thread-state: Roman
                      Numeral test
                    # 1 that's more of a how-to that Andy partly
                      redirected; chair (or helper) should either close
                      the thread or explicitly ask if the commentor is
                      happy to take their question elsewhere: need
                      extar information in SPARQL
                    # 3 connect to valueTesting which we just closed 25
                      Oct with actions on EricP, I think: language tag
                      issues, Error handling, isURI poorly named
                    # 8 clearly editorial:
                         @ protocol: typo and general, Style for PRE
                           boxes, Wrong SOAP namespace, WSDL comments
                           on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft
                         @ query results: rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS
                           styling, Query Results XML Format typo
                         @ QL: acknowledge prior art, Editorial
                           comments on Last Call WD from ivan,
                    # 2 connected to WSDL 2.0 changes we requested,
                      pending one more reply from WSD WG: Protocol
                      Review and Comments, Note about WSDL2 Binding
                    # 4 clearly-substantive requests for WG
                         @ results format: SPARQL Results Format and
                           Unbound Variables, Broad application of CSS
                           hypertext pseudo-classes
                         @ QL: from the XML Query and the XSL WGs,
                           format based on Unicode?
                    # 5 connected to an open WG issue, rdfSemantics:
                      Barstow, pfps x3, entailment, soundness,
                    # 10 possibly substantive, possibly editorial:
                         @ QL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance, Security
                           Considerations, General Document
                           Comments,Querying the Dataset, Semantics of
                           queries involving named graphs, section 2,
                           Example Errors, sections 3 onwards
                              - 1 for the chair or a QL editor to check
                                that we've handled it all and send an
                                [OK?] message: twinql Retrospective
                         @ protocol: on SPARQL protocol document

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
      [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=01&month=11&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0
      [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
      [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/11/01-dawg-irc
      [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
      [7] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-dawg-minutes
      [8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-sprot11-20051024/
      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0114.html
     [10] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
     [11] http://www.w3.org/mid/431c391c.225645515@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de
     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
     [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0033.html
     [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0108.html
     [15] http://www.w3.org/mid/43203939.225674421@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de
     [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
     [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0498.html
     [18] http://www.inf.unibz.it/krdb/w3c/sparql/
     [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
     [21] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
     [22] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050905003622.GR17056@markbaker.ca
     [23] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050906021726.GE17056@markbaker.ca

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 21:27:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC