- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:54:54 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- > From: Dan Connolly <> > Date: 6 October 2005 21:46 > > According to latest word from the WSDL WG, the (standard) URI for our > interface will be... > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery) > > i.e. something that can't be used as a qname in RDF/XML nor turtle. > > Is that good enough? I need to say within the next week or so if not. It is unfortunate but the only show-stopper would be it can't be used as a property in RDF/XML and it isn't going to be a property in all probability (now someone will prove me wrong on this). Andy @prefix sparql: <http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery)> . > > > I can't think if any show-stopper reason why not, though it sure isn't > pretty. > > For details, the thread starts with > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0009 > and culminates with > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/0013 > > > This is mostly related to serviceDescription, which we've postponed. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription > > But by the time we (or somebody like us) pick it up, it'll be too late > to give technical input on WSDL 2.0. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 12:58:42 UTC