Re: "2"^^xsd:integer = "II"^^roman:numeral (useMentionOp, valueTesting)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:02:59AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> Interesting proposal; persuing it seems to involve
> re-opening useMentionOp, which is perhaps a good thing.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#useMentionOp

Do you have a test case that illustrates this?

> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:50 -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > We seem to be stopped on the issue that
> >   "2"^^xsd:integer != "II"^^roman:numeral
> > will test true in a SPARQL implementation and false in an extended
> > SPARQL implementation. This comes from the overloaded = operator:
> >   numeric = numeric
> >   RDF term = RDF term
> > If the right side of the test is not recognized to be a numeric, the
> > test is whether they are the same RDF term (clearly not). Adding
> > roman:numeral support allows the right side to be numeric, and the
> > value is the same left side.
> > 
> > PROPOSE: change
> >   RDF term = RDF term
> > to
> >   sameTermAs(RDF term, RDF term)
> > strike
> >   RDF term != RDF term
> > and strike
> > [[
> > When selecting the operator definition for a given set of parameters,
> > the definition with the most specific parameters applies. For
> > instance, when evaluating xsd:integer = xsd:signedInt, the definition
> > for = with two numeric parameters applies, rather than the one with
> > two RDF terms. The table is arranged so that upper-most viable
> > candiate is the most specific.
> > ]]

-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 15:05:45 UTC