- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:40:28 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
On 27 Dec 2005, at 19:37, Enrico Franconi wrote: > a) in the document only 'simple entailment' is used. We want a > parametric entailment, with simple, rdf, rdfs explicit at least, and > owl-dl and owl possible. The argument here is that due to the infinite > closure of RDF graphs (due to rdf:1, rdf:2, etc; or to the > reification), this document would not even allow to have > implementations that comply with the original RDF MT! Moreover, there > are explicit requests about this in the SWBP WG, for example > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Dec/0072>. Please note that there is a simple non invasive mode to satisfy this requirement: just add at the beginning of the document a note saying that whenever simple entailment is mentioned, we could actually use also RDF, RDFS, OWL-DL entailemnts. cheers --e.
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2005 18:47:25 UTC