Re: allow implicitly unbound variables in SPARQL results? (formatting fixed) from Kendall Clark on 2005-12-14 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2005)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:02:51 -0500
To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <804BEB8B-39FD-4870-9E1D-7B43C01F83AE@monkeyfist.com>

On Dec 14, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

>
> 'c' eliminates the indexed-based approach to parsing the results. At
> the very least, I feel that if the Working Group decides on option 'c'
> than the requirement that variable name order be preserved within
> the resultset should be removed.

I don't think UMD would object to that. I've never thought that was  
worth the pain anyway.

FYI. ;>

Cheers,
Kendall

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 17:07:40 UTC