- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:53:06 -0600
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 20:44 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda > > * ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes > > for later WG approval > > Done. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html Ah... sorry, you said that before, didn't you? Let's see now... exactly what tests are you proposing for approval? Based on CVS logs, it looks lik just one: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#equality-1-1 The change is: -:xd1 :p 1.0 . +:xd1 :p "1.0e0"^^xsd:double . That seems to isolate this test from the question of what 1.0 is. Has anybody else reviewed that test? It looks OK to me at a glance. Do we have any tests for the decimal 1.3 syntax itself? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 20:53:37 UTC