decimal/double test review? [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec]

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 20:44 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > hypertext:
> >               * ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes
> >                 for later WG approval
> Done.

Ah... sorry, you said that before, didn't you?

Let's see now... exactly what tests are you proposing for approval?

Based on CVS logs, it looks lik just one:

The change is:

-:xd1 :p  1.0 .
+:xd1 :p  "1.0e0"^^xsd:double .

That seems to isolate this test from the question of what 1.0 is.
Has anybody else reviewed that test? It looks OK to me at
a glance.

Do we have any tests for the decimal 1.3 syntax itself?

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 20:53:37 UTC