- From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:21:09 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@csail.mit.edu>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Dan, You have not seen it because it is just a draft. The SWBP will be discussing it during our ftf. From the agenda at [1]: > SATURDAY 5 NOVEMBER > ... > 14:15-15:00 > LIAISON > > DAWG > Review of SPARQL > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/ > 0107.html Thanks for your clarifications. I have noted them and will discuss them during the above agendum. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0236.html Regards, Dave On Nov 3, 2005, at 16:40, Dan Connolly wrote: > I just discovered these comments that weren't sent to us. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0107.html > > A couple quick notes > > "8) There does not seem to be any way to force a literal into the > variable position in a binding." > > I think isLiteral() will do what you want there. > > > "3) UNSAID would have been of great concern with regards to > scalability, just in case it comes back :)" > > It never left. It's called UNBOUND with OPTIONAL, but it's > in there. > > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E >
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 04:21:16 UTC